ALINK="#ff0000">

Random Access Iterator


Category: iterators	Component type: concept

Description

A Random Access Iterator is an iterator that provides both increment and decrement (just like a Bidirectional Iterator), and that also provides constant-time methods for moving forward and backward in arbitrary-sized steps. Random Access Iterators provide essentially all of the operations of ordinary C pointer arithmetic.

Refinement of

Bidirectional Iterator, LessThan Comparable

Associated types

The same as for Bidirectional Iterator

Notation

`X`	A type that is a model of Random Access Iterator
`T`	The value type of `X`
`Distance`	The distance type of `X`
`i`, `j`	Object of type `X`
`t`	Object of type `T`
`n`	Object of type `Distance`

Definitions

Valid expressions

In addition to the expressions defined in Bidirectional Iterator, the following expressions must be valid.

Name	Expression	Type requirements	Return type
Iterator addition	`i += n`		`X&`
Iterator addition	`i + n` or `n + i`		`X`
Iterator subtraction	`i -= n`		`X&`
Iterator subtraction	`i - n`		`X`
Difference	`i - j`		`Distance`
Element operator	`i[n]`		Convertible to `T`
Element assignment	`i[n] = t`	`X` is mutable	Convertible to `T`

Expression semantics

Semantics of an expression is defined only where it differs from, or is not defined in, Bidirectional Iterator or LessThan Comparable.

Name	Expression	Precondition	Semantics	Postcondition
Forward motion	`i += n`	Including `i` itself, there must be `n` dereferenceable or past-the-end iterators following or preceding `i`, depending on whether `n` is positive or negative.	If `n > 0`, equivalent to executing `++i` `n` times. If `n < 0`, equivalent to executing `--i` `n` times. If `n == 0`, this is a null operation. [1]	`i` is dereferenceable or past-the-end.
Iterator addition	`i + n` or `n + i`	Same as for `i += n`	Equivalent to `{ X tmp = i; return tmp += n; }`. The two forms `i + n` and `n + i` are identical.	Result is dereferenceable or past-the-end
Iterator subtraction	`i -= n`	Including `i` itself, there must be `n` dereferenceable or past-the-end iterators preceding or following `i`, depending on whether `n` is positive or negative.	Equivalent to `i += (-n)`.	`i` is dereferenceable or past-the-end.
Iterator subtraction	`i - n`	Same as for `i -= n`	Equivalent to `{ X tmp = i; return tmp -= n; }`.	Result is dereferenceable or past-the-end
Difference	`i - j`	Either `i` is reachable from `j` or `j` is reachable from `i`, or both.	Returns a number `n` such that `i == j + n`
Element operator	`i[n]`	`i + n` exists and is dereferenceable.	Equivalent to `*(i + n)` [2]
Element assignment	`i[n] = t`	`i + n` exists and is dereferenceable.	Equivalent to `*(i + n) = t` [2]	`i[n]` is a copy of `t`.
Less	`i < j`	Either `i` is reachable from `j` or `j` is reachable from `i`, or both. [3]	As described in LessThan Comparable [4]

Complexity guarantees

All operations on Random Access Iterators are amortized constant time. [5]

Invariants

Symmetry of addition and subtraction	If `i + n` is well-defined, then `i += n; i -= n;` and `(i + n) - n` are null operations. Similarly, if `i - n` is well-defined, then `i -= n; i += n;` and `(i - n) + n` are null operations.
Relation between distance and addition	If `i - j` is well-defined, then `i == j + (i - j)`.
Reachability and distance	If `i` is reachable from `j`, then `i - j >= 0`.
Ordering	`operator <` is a strict weak ordering, as defined in LessThan Comparable.

Models

T*
vector<T>::iterator
vector<T>::const_iterator
deque<T>::iterator
deque<T>::const_iterator

Notes

[1] "Equivalent to" merely means that i += n yields the same iterator as if i had been incremented (decremented) n times. It does not mean that this is how operator+= should be implemented; in fact, this is not a permissible implementation. It is guaranteed that i += n is amortized constant time, regardless of the magnitude of n. [5]

[2] One minor syntactic oddity: in C, if p is a pointer and n is an int, then p[n] and n[p] are equivalent. This equivalence is not guaranteed, however, for Random Access Iterators: only i[n] need be supported. This isn't a terribly important restriction, though, since the equivalence of p[n] and n[p] has essentially no application except for obfuscated C contests.

[3] The precondition defined in LessThan Comparable is that i and j be in the domain of operator <. Essentially, then, this is a definition of that domain: it is the set of pairs of iterators such that one iterator is reachable from the other.

[4] All of the other comparison operators have the same domain and are defined in terms of operator <, so they have exactly the same semantics as described in LessThan Comparable.

[5] This complexity guarantee is in fact the only reason why Random Access Iterator exists as a distinct concept. Every operation in iterator arithmetic can be defined for Bidirectional Iterators; in fact, that is exactly what the algorithms advance and distance do. The distinction is simply that the Bidirectional Iterator implementations are linear time, while Random Access Iterators are required to support random access to elements in amortized constant time. This has major implications for the sorts of algorithms that can sensibly be written using the two types of iterators.